Power to the people

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Here’s the deck I presented at the IIM National Conference yesterday. It’s a look at the shift in the nature of KM, knowledge work and knowledge workers and what their organisations can do to make their own and their employees’ lives easier.

For those reading via feed who can’t see the embed, here’s a link.
The presentation went over really well. It’s always good when passionate but friendly discussion takes place after you give a presentation. It’s even better when you have audience members approach you and let you know that they were delighted to see a more visual, story-focussed presentation.

The presentation was videoed and recorded, so some time soom, I’ll have access to audio. In the meantime, if you’d like my speaking notes, I’m more than happy to give them to you if you leave a comment asking for them.

10 tips on KM strategies

In case you don’t subscribe to actKM, here’s some great thoughts posted there in recent days by Cory Banks. He gave them to a non-KM person as his top 10 tips for KM strategy in an organisation. I think they’re incredibly useful generally for KM and any activity that’s likely to require cultural and organisational change.

  1. Manage the Change - Undertake any of these activities from a change management perspective, even IT related ones. Don’t just manage the change around the initiatives.
  2. People before Technology - Spend money on travel and socialising before technology.
  3. Behavioural Change - People have to be open to supporting new/different practices. They need to adapt to change. They need to see the value to them/others.
  4. Organisational Culture - Depending on what the corporate and people culture is like will depend on whether KM efforts will survive. Examples could be that reward structures are personally focused and support a competitive environment so people may not be inclined to share.
  5. Strategic Alignment - Activities need to support the direction and priorities of the organisation. This also assists in getting things approved/endorsed.
  6. KM in the wild - Find out where knowledge creation and sharing is already happening in the organisation and study it. Learn why it has been successful (don’t just copy it) to help design other activities.
  7. Technology is an enabler - Design the process/system and then look for technologies that enable this, e.g. Don’t install a wiki and then look for what you can use it for. Work out what you want to do and then see what tools are suitable to support it.
  8. Adopt KM Principles - Don’t introduce separate KM processes. Modify your business processes to adopt KM principles.
  9. Don’t stop at the first solution - Consider different options, methods, frameworks and see what works. Experiment.
  10. Motivation - It’s not necessarily about reward and recognition. You need to find out how to motivate people to play the game.

Do you think there are any more? What do you think of Cory’s ideas?

Social Computing

Here at thoughtglue, we’re strong believers in the value of using social computing tools as a way to enhance the sharing of knowledge and to boost the corporate value of knowledge management activities.

We often get asked to define just what social computing is. It’s a hard thing to do, but this video from the smart folks at Common Craft tells it in a simple way that definitely defines social computing in an easy to understand way.

The wrong question

The “Ask the Experts” column in the latest (May 2007) issue of the Australian Institute of Management magazine Management Today contains a reader question as follows:

I’ve got some very knowledgeable people working under me, and frankly, it’s hard managing them.

I don’t know about you, but this strikes me as the wrong question to ask. It sounds to me like the person asking the question feels threatened by the “knowledgeable people” and wants to know how to control them better. What the question should have been is:

I’ve got some very knowledgeable people working under me. How can I be a better leader to them?

There’s a big difference between management (getting the boxes ticked and delivering “outcomes”) and leadership (inspiring people and openly encouraging them to accompany you on your journey).

Taking a management approach that uses containment as a way of controlling knowledge workers is absolutely the wrong way of doing things. It’s very top-down. Very command and control. This approach fails to understand modern knowledge management and knowledge workers and the success that can be achieved when leadership rather than management is the norm.

Containment of smart, knowledgeable people is a sure path to silos and lack of true knowledge in your business. What good leaders in businesses where knowledge is core need to do is collaborate, share and encourage in an open environment that fosters creativity and innovation.

Radically transparent leadership

Clive Thompson recently published an article entitled The See-through CEO, where he discusses the notion of radical transparency. For those of you unfamiliar with the notion, it’s an extremely empowering way of running your business completely in the open. From the Wikipedia definition:

Radical transparency is a management method where nearly all decision making is carried out publicly.

All draft documents, all arguments for and against a proposal, the decisions about the decision making process itself, and all final decisions, are made publicly and remain publicly archived. #

While this approach to business may be anathema to many businesses, for knowledge workers and their leaders, working this way can and does make for rich environments where the open sharing of information functions at the core of everything that happens. And it’s no longer an approach for “out there” organisations.
CIO Magazine has discussed the notion of radical transparency in an interview with British Telecom’s CIO of global services, JP Rangaswami. JP is unquestionably a CIO of a very different flavor. Visionary perhaps. He waxes lyrical on cluetrained markets, information control and letting go, Web 2.0 in business, open source and shallow bugs, customer enablement, collaborative environments, radical transparency and his credo for delivering empowerment to business through openness.
Seeing this sort of approach to business given profile in mainstream media is encouraging. It suggests that a groundswell is taking place in business and that approaches that will enable real Knowledge Worker 2.0 work to take place far more easily.

Cultural shift through social computing

Over at his ZDNet blog, Web 2.0 guru Dion Hinchcliffe has written an excellent article on the use of social computing tools as a catalyst for change in business. He examines in reasonable detail (and links off to deeper content) several aspects of the way in which these tools can enhance productivity and collaboration, noting:

Those of you tracking the Enterprise 2.0 story know the drill, namely that applying Web 2.0 tools and platforms inside organization may or may not — depending on who you are talking to — improve the way we collaborate, run our businesses, and even potentially tap major new veins of previously unexploitable worker productivity.

However, rather than the pie-in-the-sky, change the world attitude of many Web 2.0 proponents, Dion brings more than a touch of realism to the conversation when he says:

Cultural impedance is something that’s also inhibited many otherwise highly useful and potentially beneficial IT initiatives including SOA, BPM, EAI and others. The gap between what’s technically possible and what the corporate culture is willing and able to accept — must less actively encourage — is often wider than many people automatically assume.

This cultural impedance is something that may be the greatest stumbling block to Enterprise 2.0 adoption. Many businesses and government in particular, are often culturally ill-equipped to facilitate experimentation with social computing tools. Bureaucracy can get in the way and good ideas that need permission to go ahead become caught up in the committee process. The introduction of these tools to your workplace may require you to become the change agent for a significant cultural shift - not an easy task by any stretch of the imagination.

A worthwhile approach is to socialise the benefits among a small, self-interested group who will realise immediate benefit from these tools. That group can then become your evangelists, adding their voices to yours in the effort to bring these tools to your business. A larger voice, moderated by awareness of business context, is likely to get a more receptive hearing.

Additionally, Dion notes that he is seeing social computing tools emerging in many businesses under their own steam, without corporate imprimatur. Done carefully, this approach can result in significant success - the tools are in place and providing tangible benefit to staff by the time senior management are introduced to them. However there is risk here, and this needs to be done carefully, avoiding the possibility of breaching organisational rules and policy.

If you are in a position to take this path, be very aware of the environment you operate in and take pains to introduce tools that don’t break the rules - a surefire way to guarantee your project will never see the light of day and potentially risking your job. That said, done well you can be on a winner and the need to beg forgiveness for bending the rules may be offset by the gains you realise.

Enterprise 2.0

Over at acidlabs, I’ve been having a conversation about the nature of knowledge work - particularly how it’s not about recordkeeping and how the introduction of social computing tools can provide an excellent boost to knowledge worker capability. I’m deeply on the Enterprise 2.0 bandwagon. This is all, of course, a story for a much longer post.

In the meantime. take a look at this excellent presentation about Enterprise 2.0. Perhaps even socialise it amongst your co-workers and managers. There’s a lot of value to be taken away here.

Toward mutual understanding

Wouldn’t it be great if every time a knowledge worker and their manager talked about anything, both of them had a complete understanding of each other’s point-of-view?

What this is all about is finding common ground - that happy place where both worker and manager agree and are comfortable conversing.  Over at Flying Solo, Kath O’Sullivan has written a valuable article about approaches that can be taken when that “you just don’t understand” frustration sets in.

As knowledge workers and evangelists for improved approaches in our workplaces, it’s frequently the case we feel others simply don’t get what we’re talking about and we can get defensive or disheartened.  Equally, from a management point of view, there are often valid reasons for not changing practices and you can feel staff that are trying to drive change don’t understand the management point of view.

Kath argues that the best way to move toward mutual understanding is to move the conversation:

… onto the process and off the content, you are better able to explore new territory and find out what’s going on for the other person

In doing so, you draw focus away from the points of contention and highlight the fact that despite differences, the other person’s state of mind is important to you.  This is a very high emotional intelligence approach and done well is likely to move more rapidly to a place where both of you can discuss any differences in a way where ultimate agreement, or a happy compromise are far more likely to be reached.

Try it.

Changing minds

Tomorrow resting on yesterday by Unhindered by TalentThe job of the knowledge worker as evangelist for change in practices is a relatively common one. Often, it involves a fight you’re not necessarily equipped for. Getting management to understand that the tools and access to external sources of information that you need are beyond the scope of what is considered “normal” for your business can be a significant battle (and a subject for another day).

One thing you can do as a knowledge worker in this position is arm yourself with the right attitude to change minds. This attitude needs to be one of confidence, willingness to negotiate and more than a teaspoon of courage to face down the storm of naysayers that exist in many workplaces.

It’s not always easy, but here are a few things you might like to read to begin your transformation to insider evangelist and entrepreneur for the new world of knowledge work:

It’s a long, hard road to drive corporate change, particularly if your business is highly structured or highly bureaucratic - neither of these lend themselves especially well to intrapreneurs. If you want to change the way your business (whether you’re a manager or a regular Joe) operates, it’s up to you to drive change with the right attitude and the right results.

Image © Unhindered by Talent. Used under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license.

Weekend KW fun - Collaboration

Only related to knowledge work in the most tenuous way, but here’s a great example of what can happen (fictional, of course) when a team collaborates well.
Of course, we all know, collaboration is a key tenet of the Knowledge Worker 2.0.

Via Luis Suarez.

Copyright © 2007 thoughtglue. Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License .